Powered by Max Banner Ads
Eyewitnesses of Jesus
What about Jesus? Was he an authentic historical figure? Eyewitnesses Matthew, John, Peter, Paul, James , and Jude say he was. These men claim they knew Jesus. They weren’t just casual acquaintances either. Peter, John, and Matthew lived with him for several years, right up to the day he died.
Day in, day out, they traveled with him; talked with him; ate with him; heard his teachings; saw his miracles; and at least in the case of John, saw his execution. Two of these disciples wrote extensive works detailing the events in the life of Christ and frequently quoted his words. Two others, James and Jude, were very likely brothers of Jesus.
Paul, who wrote almost half of the New Testament epistles, said he met the resurrected Jesus. The profound effect this had on Paul, “the road to Damascus experience,” has become the byword for a dramatic turnaround in anyone’s life. Paul, then known as Saul, had been the leader of Christian persecution. He quickly became the most influential Christian evangelist of the first century. A more radical change is hard to imagine. Paul credits it to his personal encounter with Jesus.
Secondhand Witnesses
In addition to the eyewitnesses, two prominent secondhand witnesses also wrote accounts of Jesus. Mark recorded the apostle Peter’s reminiscences of Christ. Luke, traveling companion of Paul, informs us that he conducted a thorough investigation of all the witnesses and evidence available to him before he wrote his detailed account of the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Firsthand eyewitness reports are by far the most valuable and reliable evidence – ask any historian or lawyer. But a proliferation of secondhand information also confirms Jesus’ existence. Church leaders such as: Polycarp, Eusebius, Irenaeus, Ignatius, and Origen wrote about him.
Christians, in fact, gave the most compelling evidence. During the first three centuries A.D., an untold number of Jesus’ followers were burned, crucified, or thrown to wild animals when they refused to deny their faith. Who would willing die for someone who did not even exist?
Outside of Christianity, we find that friend and foe alike knew Jesus as a historical figure. In his book, A Ready Defense, Josh McDowell lists among others: three historians, one governor, one satirist, a prisoner, and several hostile Jews, all from antiquity, mentioning Jesus.
Other Historical Evidence of Jesus
Historians
Flavius Josephus, a Jewish historian born A.D. 37, wrote his Antiquities in the early part of the second century. He gives us a very favorable report on Jesus calling him a wise man, a doer of good deeds, and a teacher of truth.
A Roman historian by the name of Cornelius Tacitus lived about A.D. 52-117. He wrote Annals, a portion of which dealt with the life and times of Emperor Nero. In an attempt to allay suspicion, Tacitus writes, Nero falsely accused Christians with starting the fire in Rome. He punished them with “exquisite tortures.” “Christus,” the historian reminds us, “the founder of the name, was put to death by Pontius Pilate, procurator of Judea in the reign of Tiberius.”
What Tacitus calls “the pernicious superstition” was repressed for a time, but broke out again and spread across Judea and on to Rome. Consequently, this unsympathetic historian confirms both the life and death of Jesus and the rapid spread of Christianity despite persecution. Tacitus also refers to Christianity in his Histories when he discussed the destruction of the Jerusalem temple in A.D. 70.
Another early Roman historian, Suetonius, served as a court official under Emperor Hadrian. In A.D. 120, Suetonius wrote The Life of Claudius. Therein he says: “As the Jews were making constant disturbances at the instigation of Chrestus (Christ), he expelled them from Rome.” And in a second reference, Suetonius confirms Tacitus’ report on Nero: “Punishment by Nero was inflicted on the Christians, a class of men given to a new and mischievous superstition.”
Governor of Bithynia
Plinus Secundus, better known as Pliny the Younger, was governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor. In A.D. 112, he wrote Emperor Trajan requesting the emperor’s policy on Christians. Pliny wanted advice on whether he should execute all Christians or only certain ones.
Pliny’s letter provides us with several bits of information about the early Christians living in his district. They believed Jesus Christ was (is) God, and they assembled one morning each week to worship him. Part of their service included a pledge to refrain from “wicked deeds.” Specifically, they vowed to never commit fraud, theft, adultery, falsify their word, or deny a trust.
Satirist
Three historians, a governor, and a satirist all offer written evidence that Jesus was a historical character. The satirist was Lucian of Samosata. He was considered one of the greatest writers of revised Greek literature in the Roman empire. This second century Syrian born author took a decisively dim view of both Christ and Christians.
In his manuscript The Passing Peregrinus, he identifies Jesus as “. . . the man who was crucified in Palestine because he introduced this new cult into the world.” As for Christians, “They deny the Greek gods and worship that crucified sophist himself and live under his laws.” Lucian also mentions Christians several times in his work Alexander the False Prophet.
Acts of Pontius Pilate
What about Pilate? Do you suppose he ever produced a report on Jesus’ trial and crucifixion? Apparently, he did. Justin Martyr, a philosopher and early Christian apologist, wrote to Emperor Antoninus Pius about A.D. 150. He made a reference to Pilate’s report which he assumed must still be available to the current governor.
Justin told Antoninus Pius: “They pierced my hands and feet are a description of the nails driven into his hands and feet on the cross; and after he was crucified, those who crucified him cast lots for his garments, and divided them among themselves. These things are recorded in the Acts of Pontius Pilate.”
Prisoner
And then there is Mara Bar-Serapion. This Syrian born prisoner wrote a letter about A.D. 73 to his son. In his letter, Mara observes that those who persecute wise men pay for their actions. He illustrates his point with the deaths of Socrates, Pythagoras, and Christ. “What advantage did the Jews gain from executing their wise King? It was just after that, that their kingdom was abolished. The Jews, ruined and driven from their land, live in complete dispersion.” But Mara notes, the teachings of their wise king live on.
Jewish Talmud
Jews did not completely ignore Jesus either. References to him are scattered among several sections of the Jewish Talmud. Between A.D. 70 and 200, Jews developed a code of religious jurisprudence called the Mishnah. The Gemaras, a separate body of commentaries on the Mishnah, was composed during and after the same period. Together both works are called the Talmud.
In these writings Jesus is variously called: Ben Padera or Ben Pantere, or Jeshu ben Pandera or Yeshu of Nazareth. The Talmud offers this explanation for Jesus’ crucifixion. “Yeshu of Nazareth . . . hath practiced sorcery and beguiled and led astray Israel. Let everyone knowing aught in his defense come and plead for him. But they found naught in his defense and hanged him on the eve of Passover.” Another passage calls Jesus “a bastard of an adulteress.” Still other accounts allude to his disciples.
Obviously, these Jews are no friends of Jesus. But his historic reality is not questioned. In fact, it is taken for granted.
The evidence is overwhelming and conclusive. Firsthand eyewitnesses, apostles, disciples, apologists, martyrs, several ancient historians, plus a governor, a satirist, a prisoner, and a number of unbelieving Jews all put it in writing. Jesus was a real man. He lived and died. Modern scholars and historians agree.
Jerry Richard Boone
http://www.articlesbase.com/religion-articles/was-jesus-a-historical-figure-105541.html
Christian Dating Review Center
- 2010 SPS Spring Fest | Saint Peter the Apostle Church
- SPS Registration for 2010-2011 school year | Saint Peter the …
- Our Daily Journey: anxious times
- Ignite
- Jamaica Festival to Feature World Evangelist Andrew Palau …
- Jamaica Festival to Feature World Evangelist Andrew Palau …
- Hundreds slaughtered in Nigeria religious violence « Christian …
- Canadian Developer Connection : Counting Down to Seven: The …
- Christian marriages under unprecedented attack as Evangelist Benny …
- The Tories' selective distrust of the convert | And another thing…
- Confessing my religion | HumanistLife
- Worship & You: Unit 5 Study Guide (Adult Version) | Orthodox Resource
- The Reality Check » Blog Archive » The Death and Resurrection of …
- Saved by the Power of the Cross « Immanuel Lutheran Church & School
- Thirtieth Day of Lent « SUNDRY THOUGHTS OF KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
- PASHKA « sanctuary
- “If you want to buy real estate, beware and be warned” | Housing Doom
- THE KOREA HERALD: Berkshire benefits from POSCO's turnaround «
- TESTAMENT'S VIP PACKAGES TURNING FANS INTO FRIENDS ACROSS AMERICA …
- Successful Personal Injury Law Claims | All Around Topics


Was Jesus a historical figure who fought for the rights of the poor, An early socialist.?
It is easier for a rich man to pass through the eye of a needle than to enter my fathers kingdom.
well, no, he was a mythical figure
References :
yes.
References :
No, he was a bit of a comedian that liked practical jokes!
References :
There is no historical proof that Jesus ever existed.
References :
American Deist
I think he is for the poor as well as for the rich. He is just saying your money can’t get you to heaven.
He also says work and you shall eat. Read it all before deciding.
References :
Who the hell knows? According to historians, Jesus was a dime a dozen name back in those days, something like Mike or Bob or Fred is today
References :
No and No respectively
References :
rather a communist as far as i know. he wanted everybody to be equal and share things in a fair way…
References :
Jesus is God who came to redeem His fallen creation.
References :
It is highly unlikely he even existed as a person. There is no record of him anywhere. The Romans kept records of crucifixions, but there was no record of Jesus.
It would really help if there was. Not that this would have meant he was the son of God, but at least that he existed.
References :
Nope. He is my God.
You need to understand the context in which He told this.
References :
Yup.
References :
Though socialism has similarities to Christianity, there is a significant difference.
Jesus is the savior, and ever person’s responsibility and accountability is to a perfect, sinless God who sacrificailly lived and died for their sins.
References :
Jesus was a historical figure who had as his purpose exactly what he said before Pontius Pilate:
"For this I have been born, and for this I have come into the world, that I should bear witness to the truth." John 18:37
Please note in verse 36 how he states clearly, "…..my kingdom (government) is no part of this world."
He wasn’t here for political reasons.
References :
Early socialists looked forward to a world society free of nationalism and war, … that Jesus was this messiah who had come to emancipate the poor
References :
Nah, not really a socialist – because the point wasn’t to achieve an egalitarian society.
He was preaching the imminent end of the world, and wanted everyone to ditch their distracting worldliness in preparation.
References :
Jesus was no near a socialist. He would never tell an adutrous to just kill her baby . He would tell her to not sin any more.He also gave the parable about the talents. The one who increased was praised. The one who squandered his talent was stripped of what he had and gave the successfull one the talent. That is just the opposite of socialism. They take off of success and give to those who didnt earn it.And you need to read that whole message about the needle in the 10th chapter of Mark.Jesus said that if that rich ruler had let go of his wealth and invest it in the kingdom of God that he would recieve 100 times in this life,lands,houses,and wealth.Nowhere in Gods word does God desire for men to be poor. He came to give us an abundant life. But that wealth would not have any sorrow with it because he wouldn’t be so fearful of losing it.
References :
Well, there aren’t any accounts of him leading a worker’s union or anything.
Jesus is depicted as being a messiah, a chosen one, but he preached to the Jews, he didn’t preach to anyone. That was Paul’s doing, approximately three decades later.
And unfortunately we have no real historical evidence of him. It’s somewhat disheartening… we have no physical evidence of the "son of God" ever existing!
But no, I would not classify his work as socialism, or his work as social work.
Saul
References :
Luke 18:22 (New King James Version)
22 So when Jesus heard these things, He said to him, “You still lack one thing. Sell all that you have and distribute to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me.”
References :
the new king James version
The answers so far have been short but not sweet! First of all, I wonder why you are thinking about who Jesus was – do you have to write an essay, or are you wondering just for yourself? As a committed Christian, it is hard to stand back and try to give a helpful answer, but let’s try….
The best thing you can do is to get hold of a Bible or New Testament, preferably in modern English (like New International Version, or "The Message", you can also look up Bible Gateway on the internet, where you can also search for a particular verse or chapter, or keywords. Read one of the Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke or John) like you would read a novel, then go away and think, or even pray, about what sort of person Jesus was, and whether – as CS Lewis of Narnia fame said – He was mad, bad, or possibly God? If you have a chance to go on an Alpha course at any church near you, give that a go….
By the way, Jesus was mentioned in the writings of the Roman historian Josephus as well as the New Testament, and there is also the curious question of whether Jesus actually died (which is normal after crucifixion) and rose again – and why a group of discouraged and fearful followers then got empowered to turn the world upside down, as described in the Book of Acts? And why people even now are willing to die a horrible death rather than deny that they believe that this Jesus was and IS more than an early socialist or philanthropist?
References :
http://uk.alpha.org/
http://www.rejesus.co.uk/
Yes, probably, but in those days if was a good thing and could have possibly worked toward a peaceful world with enough for all. Too bad man screwed all that up.
References :